People-search sites publish your address history, your age, your phone numbers and your relatives by name. We find every listing we can reach, get you taken down, and hand you a signed certificate for each one — then keep watching, because they put you back.
Removal is a war of attrition — opt-out forms, identity checks, statutory deadlines, re-listings. Right now you send the requests and we do everything either side of that. Filing them for you is built and waiting on the paperwork that makes it lawful.
You give us a name, a city and a state. We read the public search pages, match listings to you using named signals — city, age, relatives — and report what we found and what we couldn't reach.
Exact steps for each site, deduplicated. Several of these brands share one removal system, so twelve listings usually collapse to about seven requests — around half an hour of your evening.
We look again at 20 days and again at 40. Two clean checks, two weeks apart, with nothing inconclusive in between, before anything gets called removed.
Brokers relist people — it's the business model. We re-check every verified removal on a 90-day cycle and tell you plainly when one comes back.
Each removal produces a timestamped record: the page we looked at, the moment we looked, the confidence we had it was you, and the two clean re-checks that followed. Signed with Ed25519, so you can confirm nothing changed after we issued it.
These are different jobs, not one job at different sizes. Broker removal runs on privacy law; image removal runs on copyright; account deletion is a discovery problem before it's a removal problem. So each one carries its own status, and its own honest ceiling.
We publish a removal rate measured by a method anyone can reproduce, and we grade ourselves by it with no exemption. We haven't verified removals for real customers yet, so there's nothing to show. A launch-day table full of confident numbers would be the exact thing we're objecting to.
| Provider | Verified rate | Coverage | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProvenGone | no customers yet | — | published when it exists |
| DeleteMe | not yet audited | — | — |
| Incogni | not yet audited | — | — |
| Optery | not yet audited | — | — |
| EasyOptOuts | 65% | — | Consumer Reports, independent |
The one figure here is somebody else's published research, cited as theirs. We won't put a number beside a competitor's name until we've measured it ourselves.
One plan, because there's one product. You pay when you want the verification and the patrol; you never pay to find out what's out there.
Not live yet. This is a launch list and nothing else — we don't want your address, age or relatives until you ask us to look.
Yes, and the scan is free precisely so you can. It's dozens of opt-out forms, many needing email confirmation or a phone call, most of which resurface. What you're paying for isn't the sending — it's someone going back twice to check, and telling you when it didn't work.
We ask for a name, a city and a state — enough to tell you apart from a namesake, and nothing more. We never ask for your ID, and the free scan holds nothing at all. If you'd rather give only a name, the scan still runs; it just returns more “we couldn't tell” results, because we genuinely can't.
Because it's true, and the alternative is the industry's whole problem. A blocked page and a genuine removal look identical unless you go back and check. Everyone reporting a single confident number is counting requests they sent, not listings that went away.
Court records, press coverage, and anything protected as public record or journalism. Breached data is already copied and can't be recalled. We'll tell you what's immovable rather than charge you to fail at it.
First removals usually land within a week or two of you filing. We won't call anything verified before 34 days, because that's how long two clean checks two weeks apart takes. Then it's maintenance, forever, because relisting is their business model.
Not yet. The code is written and switched off until we have the entity, the legal opinion and the insurance that filing in someone else's name requires. Until then you send the requests, which has a side benefit — nobody has to take our word that they happened.
No card, no account, no upsell wall on the results.